Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
European Journal of Mineralogy Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Journal of Mineralogy; July, August 2000; v. 12; no. 4; p. 809-823; DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2000/0012-0809
© 2000 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MARINCEA, S.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

The influence of Al on the physical and crystallographic properties of ludwigite in three Romanian occurrences

Stefan MARINCEA*

Department of Mineralogy, Geological Institute of Romania, 1 Caransebes Str., RO-78344, Bucharest, Romania

* e-mail: marincea{at}ns.igr.ro

Ludwigite samples from three boron-bearing magnesian skarns in Romania (Ocna de Fier, Masca-Baisoara and Pietroasa) were used to determine the influence of Al on the main physical and crystallographic constants of this mineral. The selected samples form a minor solid solution towards vonsenite (0.74 to 23.87 mol.%) and have XAl = Al/(Al + Fe3+) ratios between 0.004 and 0.300. Other substitutions, such as those involving Mn, Ni, Co, Ti, Sn, Sb or V are of minor importance. Generally speaking, it is proven that ludwigite shows a negative correlation between XAl and the density, indices of refraction, cell volume and c cell parameter. It is not possible to quantify the variations in the physical and crystallographic parameters by advancing the Al-for-Fe3+ substitution because both Fe2+-for-Mg and Al-for-Fe3+ substitutions are involved. However, it is clear that Al plays a major role in decreasing the cell volume, c cell parameter, density, absorption coefficient, bireflectance and refraction indices of ludwigite. Because of the influence of Al, natural compositional members of the ludwigite-vonsenite series cannot be unambiguously distinguished, neither by their cell dimensions nor by their physical parameters as previously suggested (e.g., Aleksandrov, 1968; 1982).

Key-words: ludwigite, Al-for-Fe3+ substitution, refraction indices, density, cell parameters.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
D. T. Woodford, V. B. Sisson, and W. P. Leeman
Boron metasomatism of the Alta stock contact aureole, Utah: Evidence from borates, mineral chemistry, and geochemistry
American Mineralogist, April 1, 2001; 86(4): 513 - 533.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers