Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
European Journal of Mineralogy Email Content Delivery
JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Journal of Mineralogy; June 2001; v. 13; no. 3; p. 577-590; DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2001/0013-0577
© 2001 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (35)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by MERLINO, S.
Right arrow Articles by ARMBRUSTER, T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

The real structure of tobermorite 11Å

: normal and anomalous forms, OD character and polytypic modifications Stefano MERLINO1,*, Elena BONACCORSI1 and Thomas ARMBRUSTER2

1 Università di Pisa, Dipartimento di Scienze della Terra, Via S. Maria 53, I-56126 Pisa, Italy
2 Universität Bern, Laboratorium für chemische und mineralogische Kristallographie, Freierstrasse 3, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland

* e-mail: merlino{at}dst.unipi.it

Dedicated to Prof. Dr. Wolfgang F. Müller on the occasion of his 60th birthday

Specimens of tobermorite 11Å from Wessels mine, South Africa, an ‘anomalous' tobermorite, and from Basenov, Urals, Russia, a ‘normal’ tobermorite, have been studied through X-ray diffraction. Their structural disorder, evidenced by the diffuseness of the reflections with k odd, has been dealt with through an OD approach, which allowed us to derive a reliable model of the structure, to define the two main polytypes (MDO structures), which were subsequently refined, revealing the distinctive structural details of the two specimens.

The MDO1 polytype of tobermorite 11Å from Wessels mine [orthorhombic, space group F2dd, a = 11.265(2), b = 7.386(1), c = 44.970(9) Å] was refined to R = 0.128, whereas the refinement carried on the MDO2 polytype [monoclinic, space group B11m, a = 6.735(2), b = 7.385(1), c = 22.487(4) Å, {gamma} = 123.25(1)°], converged to R = 0.051. Two refinements were carried out for the MDO2 polytype of the specimen from the Urals [space group B11m, a = 6.732(2), b = 7.368(1), c = 22.680(4) Å, {gamma} = 123.18(1)°] with data collected with conventional source (R = 0.089), and with synchrotron radiation (R = 0.110).

Common structural features are the infinite layers of calcium polyhedra, parallel to (001), with tetrahedral chains of wollastonite-type running along b and attached on both sides of these layers. The composite layers are stacked along c and connected through formation of double tetrahedral chains, with ‘ideal’ composition [Si6O15(OH)2] and [Si6O16(OH)] in the specimens from Wessels mine and Urals respectively. The most distinctive feature of the two specimens is the content of the structural cavities: whereas only water molecules were found in the specimen from Wessels mine, ‘zeolitic’ calcium cations and water molecules were found in that from Urals. These structural aspects are compared and their relevance in explaining the different thermal behaviour of the two types of tobermorite 11Å is indicated.

Key-words: tobermorite 11Å, crystal structure, OD theory, double chains, thermal behaviour, normal tobermorite, anomalous tobermorite.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
M. Kadiyski, T. Armbruster, E. V. Galuskin, N. N. Pertsev, A. E. Zadov, I. O. Galuskina, R. Wrzalik, P. Dzierzanowski, and E. V. Kislov
The modular structure of dovyrenite, Ca6Zr[Si2O7]2(OH)4: Alternate stacking of tobermorite and rosenbuschite-like units
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2008; 93(2-3): 456 - 462.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
S. Zanardi, G. Cruciani, A. Alberti, and E. Galli
Dehydration and rehydration process in boggsite: An in situ X-ray single-crystal study
American Mineralogist, July 1, 2004; 89(7): 1033 - 1042.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
S. V. Krivovichev, S. V. Krivovichev, and T. Armbruster
The crystal structure of jonesite, Ba2(K, Na) [Ti2(Si5Al)O18(H2O)](H2O)n: A first example of titanosilicate with porous double layers
American Mineralogist, February 1, 2004; 89(2-3): 314 - 318.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers