Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
European Journal of Mineralogy Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Journal of Mineralogy; February 2005; v. 17; no. 1; p. 21-30; DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2005/0017-0021
© 2005 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in ISI Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by HANTSCH, U.
Right arrow Articles by MAURI, F.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

Theoretical investigation of moganite

Ute HANTSCH1,*, Björn WINKLER1, Chris J. PICKARD2, Julian D. GALE3, Michele C. WARREN4, Victor MILMAN5 and Francesco MAURI6

1 Institut für Mineralogie/Abt. Kristallographie, Senckenberganlage 30, D-60054 Frankfurt a.M., Germany
2 TCM Group, Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge CB3 0HE, UK
3 Nanochemistry Research Institute, Department of Applied Chemistry, Curtin University of Technology, GPO Box U 1987, Perth 6845, Western Australia
4 Department of Earth Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, UK
5 Accelrys, 334 Cambridge Science Park, Cambridge CB4 0WN, UK
6 Laboratoire de Minéralogie-Cristallographie de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 Place Jussieu, F-75252 Paris, France

* Corresponding author, e-mail: u.hantsch{at}kristall.uni-frankfurt.de

The structure and properties of two different modifications of moganite have been studied using density functional theory, and the results have been compared to quartz. It is shown that the enthalpy difference between quartz and moganite, whose structure can be understood as Brazil twinning of quartz on a unit cell length scale, is negligible. This explains the significant amount of moganite in fine-grained quartz samples, as well as the frequent occurrence of Brazilian twinning in quartz. The compression mechanism of moganite has been elucidated, and it is argued that moganite is significantly more compressible than quartz. Observed and calculated NMR spectra are compared, and it is found that the bonding in quartz and moganite is very similar, consistent with the results of a Mulliken population analysis. The elastic stiffness coefficients of moganite have been predicted, and it is shown that formal-charge shell model interatomic potentials appear to be more transferable from quartz to moganite than partial-charge rigid ion equivalents.

Key-words: moganite, quartz, Brazil twinning, high pressure, density functional theory.







JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers