Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
European Journal of Mineralogy Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Journal of Mineralogy; July, August 2005; v. 17; no. 4; p. 553-566; DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2005/0017-0553
© 2005 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by GRAPES, R.
Right arrow Articles by HOSKIN, P. W.O.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

Monazite-epidote reaction in amphibolite grade blackwall rocks

Rodney GRAPES*, Kurt BUCHER and Paul W.O. HOSKIN**

Institut für Mineralogie, Petrologie und Geochemie, Universität Freiburg, D-79104 Freiburg, Germany
** Now at Department of Geological Sciences, Central Washington University, Ellensburg WA, USA

* E-mail: rodney.grapes{at}minpet.uni-freiburg.de

Composite monazite-epidote grains in a staurolite schist protolith have reacted to form apatite, chlorite + thorite, with REE enrichment of the epidote during amphibolite facies hydrothermal conditions of blackwall formation, Kvesjöen, east-central Norway. The simplified breakdown reaction is,

Formula
with additional thorite (and a possible Y-oxide phase). The breakdown reaction is explained in terms of areas of utilisation (apatite) and destruction (thorite + chlorite) of the monazite phosphate structure in relation to several interrelated factors: coupled substitutions mainly involving P5+, REE3+, Th4+, U4+, Si4+, Ca2+, possibly (Fe,Al)3+; dissolution (monazite) - reprecipitation (REE-poor apatite) with removal of REE by a fluid boundary layer. X-ray element distribution mapping shows that REE's, Y, Th and U derived from monazite alteration probably remained within the boundaries of the original composite monazite-epidote grains. Magnesium, Fe, Mn, Cl (mainly in chlorite), F in apatite were introduced to the reaction site by way of a hydrous fluid; REE's were largely fixed in the unreacted epidote corona (e.g. along grain boundaries); P, Th, U essentially remained at the reaction site in apatite and thorite. Radial cracks associated with REE-epidote and reacted epidote-monazite enclosed in corundum and staurolite of the blackwall resulted from volume expansion due to retrograde uptake of H2O (~10 wt.%) into areas of inferred structurally damaged REE-epidote and/or formation of apatite + chlorite + thorite at monazite-epidote grain contacts. Decrease in bulk rock Ca and enrichment in Al during blackwall development favoured preservation of epidote rather than monazite, and inhibited growth of new epidote.

Key-words: Blackwall, staurolite schist, monazite-epidote stability, hydrothermal reaction, REE distribution, radial cracking.







JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers