Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
European Journal of Mineralogy Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Journal of Mineralogy; May, June 2006; v. 18; no. 3; p. 337-344; DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2006/0018-0337
© 2006 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Similar articles in Web of Science
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Web of Science (3)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by LANGER, K.
Right arrow Articles by FRANSOLET, A.-M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

Electronic absorption spectra of phosphate minerals with olivine-type structures

: I. Members of the triphylite-lithiophilite series, M1[6]LiM2[6](Fex 2+Mn1-x 2+)[PO4] Klaus LANGER1, Michail N. TARAN2,* and André-Mathieu FRANSOLET3

1 Institute of Applied Geosciences, Technical University Berlin, Ernst Reuter-Platz 1, D-10587 Berlin, Germany
2 Institute of Geochemistry, Mineralogy and Ore Formation, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, Palladin Ave. 34, 03680 Kyiv-142, Ukraine
3 Laboratory of Mineralogy, University of Liège, Sart Tilman Bldg. B18, B-4000 Liège, Belgium

* Corresponding author, e-mail: taran{at}igmr.relc.com

Electronic absorption spectra of the orthorhombic olivine-type phosphate minerals of the triphylite-lithiophilite series, M1[6]LiM2[6](Fex2+Mn1-x2+)[PO4], were obtained on members with XFe = 0.195 (p, rs), 0.326 (sc, ps), 0.500 (p, rs), 0.564 (sc, ps), 0.708 (sc, ps), 0.750 (p, rs). Polarized spectra, ps, were measured on properly oriented single crystal slabs, sc, while powder remission spectra, rs, were scanned on unoriented fine grained powders, p. In all cases, microscope-spectrometric methods were used.

All triphylite-lithiophilite spectra show the following features: (i) a nearly unpolarized absorption edge at around 30000 cm–1, which shifts slightly towards higher energies on increasing XFe, (ii) very weak and sharp bands at 24200 and 23800 cm–1 (c > b > a) typical of spin-forbidden dd-bands in Mn2+, and a series of very weak, differently polarized bands in the range 19000-15000 cm–1, (iii) an intense band system in the NIR typical of spin-allowed dd-transitions in octahedral Fe2+, consisting of two strongly polarized bands, I. at around 9100-9400 cm–1 (c > > a > b) and II. at around 7400-7200 cm–1 (c > > a {approx} b) attached as a strong shoulder to I.

Energies and polarization behavior of band I. correspond closely to those of the strong Fe2+ -band in M2-octahedra of silicate olivines when the permutation of axes in Pmnb (ortho-phosphates) compared to Pbnm (orthosilicates) are taken into account. Band no. II. originates also from Fe2+ in M2, as no other transition metal ions are present eventually giving rise to absorptions in the NIR. Both bands, I. and II. are assigned to the 5A1(5T2g)->5A1(5Eg), ->5B1(5Eg) transitions of Fe2+ in M2 under pseudosymmetry mm2, which is usually adopted for M2 in silicate olivines. The energy difference, Formulae, between I. and II. represents the low-symmetry splitting of the excited state 5Eg of octahedral Fe2+ under m3m. Polarization-averaged energies of the above transition I. and of Formulae increase with iron contents XFe as

Formula

Formula
In contrast to silicate olivines, where energies of the spin-allowed bands of both Fe2+(M1) and Fe2+(M2) decrease with Fe-content, the energy of the barycenter Formula increases with XFe in the phosphates studied. This is evidently caused by the fact that Fe2+ substitutes the larger ion, Mn2+, in triphylite-lithiophilite, but the smaller one, Mg2+, in forsterite-fayalite.

Adopting the energies of the 5T2g ground-state splitting, Formulag, in Fe2+ (M2) of silicate olivines also for the phosphates, then the crystal-field parameter, 10Dq, of Fe2+(M2), is obtained as 10Dq = Formula with values increasing on XFe as

Formula

Using this 10Dq = f(XFe) relation, local mean octahedral (Fe2+-O) distances in the phosphate olivines are calculated as

Formula

From this, we obtain the local relaxation parameter {epsilon} = –0.40.

The splitting Formulae {approx} 2000 cm–1 found here for Fe2+(M2) in phosphate olivines is much higher than Formulae {approx} 400 cm–1 published for silicate olivines, although the geometry of the M2-octahedra in these phosphate olivines and in (Mg, Fe)-silicate olivines are very similar, especially the (Fe-O) distances. This discrepancy needs further study.

Key-words: electronic absorption spectra, phosphate minerals, triphylite-lithiophilite series, olivine-type structure.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Eur J MineralHome page
K. Langer, M. N. Taran, and A.-M. Fransolet
Electronic absorption spectra of phosphate minerals with olivine-type Structures: II. The oxidized minerals ferrisicklerite, M1[6]({square}1 xLix)M2[6](Fe3+ 1 x Mn2+x [PO4], and heterosite, M1[6]({square}1.00)M2[6](Fe3+ 1 x Mn3+x [PO4], with x <= 0.5
European Journal of Mineralogy, July 1, 2007; 19(4): 589 - 592.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers