Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Similar articles in Web of Science Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Web of Science (1) Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Seydoux-Guillaume, A.-M. Articles by Ingrin, J. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Contrasting response of ThSiO₄ and monazite to natural irradiation

¹ LMTG, UMR 5563 CNRS – Université Paul Sabatier – IRD, 14 avenue Edouard Belin, 31400 Toulouse, France
² GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) Potsdam-Division 4, Telegrafenberg, 14473 Potsdam, Germany

^* Corresponding author, e-mail: seydoux{at}lmtg.obs-mip.fr

In order to compare the irradiation-induced behaviour of monazite and ThSiO₄, a large single crystal of monazite from Norway (Arendal monazite) containing several ThSiO₄ inclusions was investigated. The estimated theoretical self-irradiation dose received by monazite near those inclusions was approximately 3 x 10¹⁹ -decay/g. Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) analyses were performed on both host and inclusion. The TEM samples were prepared by the focused ion beam (FIB) technique. Monazite and ThSiO₄ were found to have very different textures, including the presence of an amorphous zone between them. Crystalline monazite showed mottled diffraction contrast, which is characteristic of irradiation damage in this mineral. Observations suggest that there is a maximum defect density in monazite which cannot be exceeded. It is unlikely that some natural monazite can surpass this defect density. In contrast, ThSiO₄ is completely amorphous and exhibits an unusual spherical, bubble-like texture. The size of these spheres is in the range of 10 to 200 nm. It is proposed that ThSiO₄ is composed of aggregated spheres very similar to a gel. The zone between these two phases was certainly amorphized due to irradiation induced by -decay of Th and U. It could be a preferential alteration zone and act as high-diffusive pathway for elements.

Key-words: monazite, amorphous thorium silicate, TEM, FTIR, natural irradiation, aggregate spheres.

This article has been cited by other articles:

				A. Putnis Mineral Replacement Reactions Reviews in Mineralogy and Geochemistry, January 1, 2009; 70(1): 87 - 124. [Full Text] [PDF]

				Y. H. Dawood and H. H. A. El-Naby Mineral chemistry of monazite from the black sand deposits, northern Sinai, Egypt: a provenance perspective Mineralogical Magazine, August 1, 2007; 71(4): 389 - 406. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]