Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Seryotkin, Y. V. Articles by Bakakin, V. V. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

The reversibility of the paranatrolitete-tranatrolite transformation

¹ Institute of Geology and Mineralogy, Russian Academy of Sciences, Koptyuga. 3, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
² Novosibirsk State University, Pirogova 2, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia
³ Institute of Inorganic Chemistry, Russian Academy of Sciences, Lavrentieva 3, 630090 Novosibirsk, Russia

^* Corresponding author, e-mail: yuvs{at}uiggm.nsc.ru

The problem of the reversibility of paranatrolite-tetranatrolite transformation is a key problem in understanding the paragenesis of the natrolite group zeolites. Two paranatrolite samples of different chemical composition were studied by X-ray powder diffraction and thermogravimetry. It was found that the existence of a particular phase depends on the water vapor pressure in an ambient atmosphere. High-potassium paranatrolite from the Khibiny massif, Kola Peninsula, Na_1.90K_0.22Ca_0.06[Al_2.24Si_2.76O₁₀]·3.1H₂O, is stable at 25 °C and air humidity of about 70 %. Upon heating, the sample loses some of the water content and transforms into tetranatrolite. At 38 °C it consists of a pure tetranatrolite phase. The reverse tetranatrolite-paranatrolite transformation occurs upon cooling the sample to room temperature. The recovery of the paranatrolite phase proceeds even after heating to 300 °C with a 60 % water loss. A high-calcium sample from Mont Saint-Hilaire, Quebec, with approximate formula Na_1.59Ca_0.32Sr_0.02[Al_2.35Si_2.65O₁₀]·nH₂O, had significantly lower stability. It consisted of a mixture of paranatrolite and tetranatrolite in ambient conditions. Upon heating, the sample already consisted of a pure tetranatrolite at 31 °C. After keeping the sample for one day under normal conditions a two-phase mixture close to the initial sample was restored. The sample wetted by water immediately transformed into paranatrolite. A lower stability of high-calcium paranatrolite as compared with the high-potassium sample may be explained by the difference in the configuration of ionic-molecular assemblage and, presumably, by a higher water content.

Key-words: zeolites, paranatrolite, tetranatrolite, gonnardite, phase transformation, dehydration, rehydration.