Quick Search:    advanced search

GSW Home   GeoRef Home   My GSW Alerts   Contact GSW   About GSW   Journals List   Help

This Article Figures Only Full Text Full Text (PDF) Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Citation Map Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Chakraborty, S. Articles by Neogi, S. Search for Related Content GeoRef GeoRef Citation

Nucleation kinetics controlled by chemical overstepping and its tectonic implications: an example from the Sikkim Himalaya

¹ Institut für Geologie, Mineralogie und Geophysik, Ruhr Universität Bochum, 44780 Bochum, Germany
² Indian Institute of Science Education & Research, HC-VII, Sector III, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700106, India
³ Geological Survey of India, 27, J.L. Nehru Road, Kolkata-700 016, India

^* Corresponding author, e-mail: Sumit.Chakraborty{at}rub.de

The geometric relationship between porphyroblasts and foliations is widely used to interpret the tectonic history of metamorphic rocks and orogenic belts. Such interpretation makes implicit assumptions about the mechanisms and kinetics of nucleation and growth. Within the complete Barrovian sequence in the Sikkim Himalaya, the discovery of some texturally unusual metapelitic rocks provide new insights into the nucleation behavior of porphyroblasts. We have combined information on the regional disposition of isograds, field relations, compositional zoning of garnet, geothermometry, bulk chemistry and element mobility to demonstrate that nucleation mechanism in such rocks can be determined by mass transport controlled chemical overstepping (the shift in free energy of a system away from equilibrium caused by a change in bulk chemistry). We show that such chemical overstepping may cause simultaneously crystallizing porphyroblasts from neighbouring domains to nucleate and grow into very different microstructures that may be interpreted as syn-tectonic in some cases and post-tectonic in others if only textural criteria are used. Thus, a robust interpretation of porphyroblasts as syn- or post-tectonic requires that the influence of chemistry on the nucleation and growth behavior be considered along with textural criteria. Such considerations can considerably simplify interpretation of the metamorphic history in this part of the Himalaya.

Key-words: nucleation, kinetics, garnet, tectonics, mass transfer.