Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
European Journal of Mineralogy Signup for GSW Email News
JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Journal of Mineralogy; September/October; v. 20; no. 5; p. 827-834; DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2008/0020-1883
© 2008 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via ISI Web of Science (2)
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by O’Brien, P. J.
Right arrow Articles by Ziemann, M. A.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

From field observation to experimental petrology and back - A special issue to honour Werner Schreyer

Preservation of coesite in exhumed eclogite: insights from Raman mapping

Patrick J. O’Brien* and Martin A. Ziemann

Institut für Geowissenschaften, Universität Potsdam, Karl-Liebknecht-Strasse 24/25, 14476 Golm, Germany

* Corresponding author, e-mail: obrien{at}geo.uni-potsdam.de

Abundant coesite relics have been identified in a single thin section from a carbonate-bearing eclogite from the Saidenbach reservoir, Erzgebirge, German Variscides. The rock is only very slightly retrogressed despite having experienced granulite facies conditions during exhumation. Coesite, mostly 0.1–0.2 mm in long dimension, occurs mainly in garnet but has also been identified in omphacite. Partial transformation of coesite to palisade quartz, the relief contrast between these two phases, and radial cracks around the inclusions allowed an easy optical identification of coesite. Micro-Raman mapping of specific phases from grids of thousands of individual Raman spectra helped show that: (1) a visible palisade quartz corona between coesite and host is in places lacking, and (2) some inclusions contain aragonite. Based on published results from modelling of elastic behaviour of minerals along a pressure–temperature path, a scarcity of palisade quartz suggests that capturing of coesite during garnet growth occurred well into the coesite stability field such that quartz growth at the coesite = quartz univariant curve during decompression was only minimal in unfractured, overpressured inclusions. Another consequence of a high pressure for inclusion capture is that final fracturing of host garnet occurs at lower temperatures. This would explain the presence of aragonite relics in some inclusions. Based on extrapolations from kinetic experiments, aragonite should invert to calcite even faster than coesite to quartz and thus suggests temperatures of 300 °C or less for final fracturing.

Key-words: coesite, aragonite, UHP metamorphism, eclogite, Erzgebirge.







JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers