Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
European Journal of Mineralogy Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Journal of Mineralogy; December; v. 20; no. 6; p. 1043-1053; DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2008/0020-1866
© 2008 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Sanchez, M. S.
Right arrow Articles by Dyar, M. D.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

MSA/GS, ANL Short Course on Amphiboles

Characterization of historical amphibole samples from the former vermiculite mine near Libby, Montana, U.S.A

Matthew S. Sanchez1, Mickey E. Gunter2,* and M. Darby Dyar3

1 RJ LeeGroup Inc., 350 Hochberg Road, Monroeville, Pennsylvania 15146, USA
2 Department of Geological Sciences, University of Idaho, Moscow, Idaho 83844, USA
3 Department of Earth and Environment, Mount Holyoke College, South Hadley, Massachusetts 01075, USA

* Corresponding author, e-mail: mgunter{at}uidaho.edu

To determine if the composition or morphology of amphiboles occurring in the Rainy Creek vermiculite deposit near Libby, Montana, has changed as the deposit has been mined over the last 70 years, we assembled amphiboles collected in the ~1920s, ~1960s, and 1999. Amphibole morphologies range from ~20–50 µm prismatic single crystals to massive aggregates of fine-grained, asbestiform amphiboles only a few micrometers in size. Compositional data obtained by electron-microprobe analysis (EPMA) using wavelength-dispersive spectrometry and Fe3+/{sum}Fe ratio determined by Mössbauer spectroscopy showed that calcic, sodic–calcic, and sodic group amphiboles are present in each suite. The samples all have Mg numbers > 0.90. According to the current nomenclature for amphibole species, the majority of amphiboles analyzed are winchite or richterite. There are a few exceptions: one of the 1960 samples was tremolite, while one of the ~1920s samples was fluoro-magnesio-arfvedsonite; the latter was characterized optically. Compositions generally concur with previous characterizations of the amphiboles originating from the Rainy Creek Complex, but composition variations occur both within each temporally-related sample suite and among suites. Therefore, suggestions that the bulk composition of amphiboles in the deposit has changed over the 70 years of mining are unsupported. Overall, there is no correlation between major and minor element composition and morphology. However, fibrous and prismatic crystal trace element concentrations from a sample from the 1920s suite were analyzed using laser ablation mass spectrometry. Based on the trace elements the separate morphologies could be distinguished by cluster analysis, but only within this single sample.

Key-words: amphiboles, EPMA, asbestiform amphiboles, trace elements, Libby, Montana USA.




This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
American MineralogistHome page
M. E. Gunter and M. S. Sanchez
Amphibole forensics: Using the composition of amphiboles to determine their source, the Libby, Montana, example
American Mineralogist, May 1, 2009; 94(5-6): 837 - 840.
[Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF]




JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers