Quick
Search: 
 
advanced search
 GSW Home    GeoRef Home    My GSW Alerts    Contact GSW    About GSW    Journals List    Help 
European Journal of Mineralogy Don't get GSW? Talk to your librarian.
JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS

European Journal of Mineralogy; April/May; v. 21; no. 2; p. 275-292; DOI: 10.1127/0935-1221/2009/0021-1917
© 2009 E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers
This Article
Right arrow Figures Only
Right arrow Full Text
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Right arrow Citation Map
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Liebscher, A.
Right arrow Articles by Gottschalk, M.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
GeoRef
Right arrow GeoRef Citation

Articles

Synthetic Sr–Ca margarite, anorthite and slawsonite solid solutions and solid–fluid Sr–Ca fractionation

Axel Liebscher1,2,*, Maik Thiele1, Gerhard Franz1, Guido Dörsam1 and Matthias Gottschalk2

1 Section Mineralogy-Petrology, Technical University Berlin, Ackerstr. 73–75, D 13355 Berlin, Germany
2 Helmholtz Centre Potsdam, GFZ German Research Centre for Geosciences, Telegrafenberg, D 14473 Potsdam

* Corresponding author, e-mail: alieb{at}gfz-potsdam.de

Calcium–strontium solid-solutions of margarite, anorthite, slawsonite, calcite and strontianite were synthesized from oxide–hydroxide–fluid mixtures by way of hydrothermal experiments at 400–500 °C and 390–500 MPa. The fractionation of Ca and Sr between the coexisting phases was investigated via electron microprobe and X-ray diffraction analyses of the solids and inductively coupled plasma–optical emission spectrometry of the fluids. A complete solid-solution series of margarite is indicated and the lattice parameters a, b, c, and V increase linearly with increasing Sr content. The lattice parameters of (Ca,Sr)-anorthite show a likewise linear increase with increasing Sr content. The formation of Sr–Ca slawsonite and Sr–Ca strontianite is restricted to high bulk Sr contents. The fractionation of Ca and Sr between minerals and fluid expressed as KD(Sr–Ca)mineral–fluid increases in the following sequence: calcite–fluid < anorthite–fluid ≤ margarite–fluid {approx} 1 ≤ strontianite–fluid < slawsonite–fluid. At low XSr (i.e., for common metamorphic bulk-rock compositions), KD(Sr–Ca)calcite–fluid = 0.09, KD(Sr–Ca)anorthite–fluid = 0.51, and KD(Sr–Ca)margarite–fluid = 0.56; the Sr/Ca ratio of the fluid is therefore generally higher than that of the coexisting minerals. This suggests that during prograde metamorphism and probably continuous dehydration, the Sr/Ca ratio of the rock decreases continuously with time. But, owing to the roughly equal Sr–Ca mineral–fluid fractionation for margarite and anorthite, which was also determined for zoisite/clinozoisite and lawsonite, this decrease will result in only moderate changes of whole-rock and fluid Sr-composition as long as these phases are the main Sr-bearing minerals.

Key-words: margarite, experimental petrology, mineral–fluid fractionation, XRD, strontium, geochemistry.







JOURNAL HOME HELP FEEDBACK/COMMNET SUBSCRIBE ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2009 by E. Schweizerbart'sche Verlagsbuchhandlung Science Publishers